Pain in the form of intercostal neuralgia with dysesthesia at the site of trocar insertion is rarely documented but more frequent than generally recognized

Pain in the form of intercostal neuralgia with dysesthesia at the site of trocar insertion is rarely documented but more frequent than generally recognized. Many centres perform short-stay surgery that may lead to underestimation of pain results. In most series pain resolves within months, but Walles and colleagues could detect a persistence for years (Walles et al., 2008).

http://www.intechopen.com/books/topics-in-thoracic-surgery/surgical-management-of-primary-upper-limb-hyperhidrosis-a-review

Patients with surgical sympathectomies have low plasma levels of DA and NE [49], whereas EPI:NE ratios are increased

Patients with surgical sympathectomies have low plasma levels of DA and NE [49], whereas EPI:NE ratios are increased (unpublished observations), suggesting decreased sympathetically mediated exocytosis and compensatory adrenomedullary activation.


Catecholamines 101, David S. Goldstein
Clin Auton Res (2010) 20:331–352

“In no other area than Sympathetic Surgery, disagreement, conflicting opinion, different definitions and misleading interpretations of the data exist"

8th ISSS Symposium New York, 2009: 

“In no other area than Sympathetic Surgery, disagreement, conflicting opinion, different definitions and misleading interpretations of the data exist. Mainly regarding surgical indications, the level and extent of the procedure and results evaluation”.

ATS Expert Consensus for the Surgical Treatment of Hyperhidrosis powerpoint presentation  – October 6, 2012, XVI Congreso Boliviana de Cirugia Cardiaca, Toracica y Vascular, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.

http://cirugiadetorax.org/2012/10/09/vats-sympathectomy-for-hyperhidrosis-dr-jose-ribas-de-milanez-de-campos/

or:
https://archive.today/Q047q

Inflammation in dorsal root ganglia after peripheral nerve injury: Effects of the sympathetic innervation

Following a peripheral nerve injury, a sterile inflammation develops in sympathetic and dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) with axons that project in the damaged nerve trunk. Macrophages and T-lymphocytes invade these gan- glia where they are believed to release cytokines that lead to hyperexcitability and ectopic discharge, possibly contributing to neuropathic pain. Here, we examined the role of the sympathetic innervation in the inflammation of L5 DRGs of Wistar rats following transection of the sciatic nerve, comparing the effects of specific surgical in- terventions 10–14 days prior to the nerve lesion with those of chronic administration of adrenoceptor antago- nists. Immunohistochemistry was used to define the invading immune cell populations 7 days after sciatic transection. Removal of sympathetic activity in the hind limb by transecting the preganglionic input to the rele- vant lumbar sympathetic ganglia (ipsi- or bilateral decentralization) or by ipsilateral removal of these ganglia with degeneration of postganglionic axons (denervation), caused less DRG inflammation than occurred after a sham sympathectomy. By contrast, denervation of the lymph node draining the lesion site potentiated T-cell in- flux. Systemic treatment with antagonists of α1-adrenoceptors (prazosin) or β-adrenoceptors (propranolol) led to opposite but unexpected effects on infiltration of DRGs after sciatic transection. Prazosin potentiated the influx of macrophages and CD4+ T-lymphocytes whereas propranolol tended to reduce immune cell invasion. These data are hard to reconcile with many in vitro studies in which catecholamines acting mainly via β2-adrenoceptors have inhibited the activation and proliferation of immune cells following an inflamma- tory challenge. 


Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 182 (2014) 108–117 

Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

lowering of heart rate and blood pressure, decreased responsiveness of the cardiocirculatory system to emotional stimuli after sympathectomy

"lowering of heart rate and blood pressure, decreased responsiveness of the cardiocirculatory system to emotional stimuli: it is an effect that is especially noticeable in patients operated on for erythrophobia and less evident in those operated for hyperhidrosis. It is almost always a welcome phenomenon, which contributes considerably to the feeling of tranquility and serenity that generally supersedes anxiety. Excessive reduction in blood pressure or heart rate may lead to a state of weakness and fatigue that may require removal of the clips in approx. 2%. This rare state of asthenia contrasts with the increased energy and vigor that most patients experience when they feel freed from overwhelming anxiety."    

"The neurovegetative nervous system is, however, very dynamic and tends to adapt continuously during lifetime to all environmental or organic changes and conditions. Therefore, it reacts very individually when a reflex circuit has been blocked. The resulting side effects cannot be predicted in detail, and though they in most patients are relatively mild or even absent, there is a small group of patients developing heavy side effects. Therefore, surgery should only be considered in carefully selected cases in whom non-invasive treatment has failed and in whom the detrimental consequences of erythrophobia regarding the psychosocial situation and the quality of life is such to justify more adverse side effects. It should also always be kept in mind that therapy can be ineffective and that, in the long term, 10-15% of patients do not consider themselves satisfied with the result of surgery. In any case, the author prefers the use of a potentially reversible surgical technique (ESB), instead of destructive techniques (cutting, coagulation, removal of ganglia)."  
http://www.chir.it/en_erythrophobia.php

medical procedures are misrepresented in the media

"If your patients rely on the mainstream media for medical advice, they may well think that cancer has been cured many times over, and have other inflated views about the benefits of new treatments and tests.
AND they probably would be shocked to learn about the potential downsides of many medical interventions, let alone costs.
That’s the conclusion of a comprehensive analysis of almost 2000 medical news items published in the US by print, online and television outlets between 2006 and 2013.
It was undertaken by the media watchdog Health News Review, and recently published in JAMA Internal Medicine (5 May, 2014). Most stories were judged unsatisfactory in how they covered the costs, benefits, harms and quality of the evidence supporting the new treatment or test, and how it was compared to alternatives.
“Drugs, medical devices, and other interventions were usually portrayed positively; potential harms were minimised and costs were ignored,” wrote the founder of Health News Review, Gary Schwitzer."

Melissa Sweet, Medical Observer, 24th Jun 2014

Chest wall paresthesia affects a significant but previously overlooked proportion of patients following sympathectomy

Paresthetic discomfort distinguishable from wound pain was described by 17 patients (50.0%). The most common descriptions were of ‘bloating’ (41.2%), ‘pins and needles’(35.3%), or ‘numbness’ (23.5%) in the chest wall. The paresthesia resolved in less than two months in 12 patients (70.6%), but was still felt for over 12 months in three patients (17.6%). Post-operative paresthesia and pain did not impact on patient satisfaction with the surgery, whereas compensatoryhyperhidrosis in 24 patients (70.6%) did (P=0.001). The rates and characteristics of the paresthesia following needlescopic VATS are similar to those observed after conventional VATS. Conclusions: Chest wall paresthesia affects a significant but previously overlooked proportion of patients following needlescopic VATS.



Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:313-319


the severity of post-sympathectomy (post-SE) dysfunction

injury to the sympathetic chain during surgery must be avoided in Links to Published Research Forum: "The aim of this study was to identify retrospectively, lumbar sympathectomy (SE) using thermography (TG) and to evaluate clinically, the severity of post-sympathectomy (post-SE) dysfunction after anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures (ALIF, XLIF).
METHODS:
Twenty eight patients with suspected SE were referred for TG to both legs. They completed our questionnaire on severity of difficulties after SE. We evaluated the ability of physical examinations to reveal the SE in contrast to TG and compared the symptoms (warmer leg and inhibited leg sweating) of SE with questionnaire responses as subjective measure and TG as objective measure.
RESULTS:
SE was diagnosed in 0.5% after ALIF at L5/S1, in 15% after ALIF at Th12-L5 and in 4% after XLIF at T12-L5. SE severely reduced the quality of life in two cases. The ability to distinguish differences in leg temperature by palpation after SE was found in 32%. All physical examinations together were insufficient for reliably disclosing SE. Subjective symptoms of SE were often false positive and proven SE by TG was often a clinically false negative.
CONCLUSION:
This is the first study to examine post-SE dysfunction objectivelya using TG after ALIF and XLIF, and the first to evaluate clinically, the severity of the post-SE syndrome. Before surgery we cannot foresee potentially poor SE results. For this reason, injury to the sympathetic chain during surgery must be avoided. The advantage of TG for identifying SE is its non-invasiveness and reliability.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24263213"



'via Blog this'

most of the existing literature is geared towards assessing only the effectiveness of the surgical sympathectomy

"Given the fact that most of the existing literature is geared towards a) assessing only the effectiveness of the surgical sympathectomy procedures, and b) publishing only studies with positive results, adverse effects and complications are not systematically reported but rather as a secondary outcome. It seems, therefore, highly likely that the complications as reported here, are truly underestimated.



The study indicates that surgical sympathectomy, irrespective of operative approach and indication, may be associated with many and potentially serious complications."  

Are We Paying a High Price for Surgical Sympathectomy? A Systematic Literature Review of Late Complications

http://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900%2800%2944124-6/abstract

33% of patients reported compensatory hyperhidrosis that was either 'severe' or 'incapacitating'

Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for primary hyperhidrosis of the...IPG487 Safety: "Compensatory hyperhidrosis was reported in 92% (416/453), 86% (1720/2000) and 74% (1265/1700) of patients in 3 case series. In 2 of these studies 33% (557/1700 and 150/453) of patients reported compensatory hyperhidrosis that was either 'severe' or 'incapacitating'."




Louise Field, 27, died after ETS surgery (1/3) | VerySweatyBetty.com

Louise Field, 27, died after ETS surgery (1/3) | VerySweatyBetty.com: "A ‘fit and healthy’ young woman was left brain dead after a pioneering operation to reduce her excessive sweating went catastrophically wrong, a medical panel has heard. Louise Field, 27, suffered severe brain damage when doctors accidentally punctured her lung and pumped gas into her stomach, the General Medical Council heard. She died two days later. Vascular surgeon Dr Michael Ormiston and anaesthetist Dr Wasfy Yanny face a catalogue of charges arising from the bungled operation at a Bupa Hospital in Harpenden, Hertfordshire.

Dr Ormiston, who had carried out the operation a handful of times, first punctured the keen sportswoman’s lung with a needle then pumped carbon dioxide into her stomach. Dr Yanny failed to take action when Ms Field’s oxygen levels dropped dangerously low and should have realised this damaged the patient’s brain, the hearing was told. Ms Field had


Louise Field
chosen to undergo an operation to reduce heavy sweating on her hands and feet, the GMC heard.
Sarah Plaschkes, for the GMC, told the hearing: ‘She was born on February 18, 1975, and was to die tragically on March 22, 2002, aged just 27. ‘She was fit and healthy and played a lot of sport however she was embarrassed by excessive sweating of the hands and feet."



'via Blog this'

"He knows the procedure is controversial because of the unpredictability of side-effects"

Information about surgery for sweaty hands: "surgeon "knows the procedure is controversial because of the unpredictability of side-effects"

"Ferrar believes much of the controversy lies in surgeons, mainly in America, who perform the surgery on anyone who asks for it, rather than the severe end of the spectrum.
"In America there are so many that have been operated on when it hasn't been necessary, or the surgeon has given the patient false expectations, that there are support groups for people who've had complications or adverse effects. The people that come to me are almost self-selecting; they've tried everything else."
The youngest patient he has performed an endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy on was 8 years old, with most being in puberty (when the condition tends to arise). Or they are in their 20s when they are beginning relationships and jobs."

Publication info: Waikato Times [Hamilton, New Zealand] 07 Apr 2012: 22."


Sympathectomy is by no means a benign procedure, and sympathectomy for sweating can induce pain and allodynia

"Sympathectomy is by no means a benign procedure, and sympathectomy for sweating can induce pain and allodynia at the border zone which is sometimes associated with pronounced increase in sweating in that area." (p. 534) Surgical Disorders of the Peripheral Nerves by Rolfe Birch Springer, Jan 21, 2011 - Medical - 512 pages original article published in Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2002; 84:181-184"

"The custom of a majority is no guarantee of safety and is seldom a guide to best medical practice." in Legal Forum

Cameron`s claim that there has been only one death attributable to synchronous bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy is implausible. Surgeons and anaesthetists are reticent in publicizing such events and Civil Law Reports of settled cases are an inadequate measure of the current running total. The custom of a majority is no guarantee of safety and is seldom a guide to best medical practice.
Jack Collin,
Consultant Surgeon
Oxford
http://www.bmj.com/content/320/7244/1221?tab=responses

Antiviral drug stockpile a waste of money, says study | smh.com.au

Antiviral drug stockpile a waste of money, says study | smh.com.au: "Governments around the globe may have wasted billions of dollars stockpiling antiviral drugs to use against an influenza pandemic, according to a damning review drawing on previously suppressed data.
Australia was one of several countries to stockpile the drugs known as Tamiflu and Relenza, believing they would reduce hospital admissions and complications of influenza, such as pneumonia, in the event of an outbreak of swine or bird flu.
But a review of data from trials involving more than 24,000 people, published on Thursday by the Cochrane Collaboration and the British Medical Journal, concluded the drugs were of only marginal benefit, shortening the duration of influenza symptoms by just half a day.
The review found no good evidence that the drugs prevented the spread of the virus between people, or any of its serious consequences, such as infections. It found Tamiflu increased the risk of psychiatric disturbances, renal problems, nausea, vomiting and headaches."



'via Blog this'

Dr Fabian Baez was accused of sexual misconduct against four female patients - each who was young or psychological vulnerable - by the Health Care Complaints Commission.

A prominent Sydney cosmetic surgeon has been found guilty of professional misconduct for offering a patient with mental illness Botox in exchange for sex.
Dr Fabian Baez was accused of sexual misconduct against four female patients - each who was young or psychological vulnerable - by the Health Care Complaints Commission.
This month the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal found Dr Baez had sexual intercourse with one patient on two or three occasions in exchange for the provision of one session of Botox injections.
He had known the patient since late 1999 when as a GP he was treating her for bipolar affective disorder.
The sex occurred at a beauty salon known as Devine Imaging, which Dr Baez was associated with.
The owner of the business, Patricia Devine, gave evidence that she generated about $100,000 of cosmetic business for Dr Baez, including running promotional nights where he was the guest speaker.
In an interview with HCCC investigators, Dr Baez denied having sex with the patient and said he did not remember her, even though saw her 42 times in two years.
"The sexual exploitation of any patient is a matter of grave concern. The exploitation of a patient with known mental health issues is of even greater concern," the tribunal said.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/surgeon-offered-mentally-ill-woman-botox-in-exchange-for-sex-tribunal-finds-20140216-32tg8.html#ixzz2xnVYTKoG

sympathectomy is based on such anecdotal observation and small case studies which have failed to stand up to scientific scrutiny

Clinical trials do exist and their inability to demonstrate effectiveness suggests an obvious conclusion: the argument for sympathectomy, by chemical or surgical means, is based on such anecdotal observation and small case studies which have failed to stand up to scientific scrutiny. To date there are no reproducible, blinded, randomized studies utilizing control populations which have demonstrated a benefit to sympathetic blockade in CRPS.

DISABILITY MEDICINE, The Official Periodical of the American Board of Independent Examiners,
Vol. 5 No. 3-4 July - December 2005
www.abime.org/documents/Journalv5n34.pdf

US scientists were “accomplices after the fact” in Japanese doctors’ war crimes

BioEdge: US scientists were “accomplices after the fact” in Japanese doctors’ war crimes: "A fascinating answer appears in the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. The broad outline of the story has been well documented, even if it is not widely known. To cut a long story short, the Americans struck a deal with the doctors. They traded immunity from prosecution for access to scientific information from the ghastly Japanese experiments – many of which are too grim to detail here. (If you have the stomach for it, a remorseful doctor describes, at the age of 90, some of his vivisection experiments in an article in the Japan Times.)

A report from US scientists who interviewed the staff of Unit 731 and the surviving records concluded that “Such information could not be obtained in our own laboratories because of scruples [sic] attached to human experimentation"



'via Blog this'

"We quickly discovered that lay people often lack the (medical) knowledge to make well-considered judgements"

Jane McCredie: Wishing on risks

MjaInsight Monday, 11 November, 2013
Moreover, GPs and plastic surgeons can both be approached directly by patients in The Netherlands. The physicians studied raised many arguments that were expected: they used patient autonomy, risks and benefits, normality and justice to limit wish-fulfilling medicine. In addition, arguments new to this debate were uncovered, which were frequently used to justify compliance with a patient's request. Such arguments seem familiar from conventional medicine, including empathy, the patient–doctor relationship and reassurance. Moreover, certain arguments that play a significant role in the literature on wish-fulfilling medicine and enhancement were not mentioned, such as concepts of disease and the enhancement–treatment dichotomy and ‘suspect norms’.

"We quickly discovered that lay people often lack the (medical) knowledge to make well-considered judgements"

BioEdge: The scandal of wasted research dollars

BioEdge: The scandal of wasted research dollars: "Twenty years ago, a British statistician complained in the BMJ that much medical research was “seriously flawed through the use of inappropriate designs, unrepresentative samples, small samples, incorrect methods of analysis, and faulty interpretation.” 

Today, says the BMJ’s former editor, the influential writer Richard Smith, the only word to be changed in that diagnosis is probably “much”. It should now be “most”. And he complains that the leaders of the medical profession are not interested in changing the situation."



'via Blog this'

Evidence based medicine is broken

Indeed, the current regulation is handmaiden to the polluters, as this partial list of examples indicates:
• The regulation does not demand that the research agenda be driven strictly by patient needs, not corporate interests.
• It is silent about the adequacy of selection criteria, outcome measures, and statistical significance, three variables that are often used by the polluters to manipulate evidence.
• It says nothing about what should count as scientific and unscientific research. This lacuna allows the latter to take place too, provided, of course, that it labels itself as "scientific".
• The regulation introduces exceptions to the head-to-head rule, exceptions that allow the polluters to test every new drug against placebo or no treatment thereby showing us exactly what they want: efficacy, but not necessarily over the current treatment.[4]
• It does not ban regulators, health care institutions and medical professionals from having financial conflicts of interest. Worse than that, "transparency", the only thing it insists on and quite feebly so, gives both the doctor and the patient nothing but the misleading impression that they can make a truly informed choice.
• The regulation does not ban subject recruitment through financial incentives, a practice capable of introducing outcome bias.
• It does not ban seeding trials, i.e., marketing exercises concealed as scientific research.
• It does not ban manipulative advertising to both doctor and patient inside or outside "scientific" journals.
• It does not ban medicalisation and “me too” drugs.
• It does not regard polluted information, whether it involves misconduct or not, as a sufficient condition for rendering disclosure inadequate. Thus, it lets informed consent degenerate into a legal fiction and the principle of autonomy into a cynical farce.[5]
• Worst of all, it is perfectly ethical: being the codified expression of the collective conscience of our medicine, it naturally purports to be moral.
In light of these examples we should ask ourselves: If the polluters of medical knowledge can tick the ethical box, then what does that say about our ethic?
1 Spence D. Evidence based medicine is broken. BMJ 2014;348:g22.
2 Goldacre B. Bad Pharma. London:Fourth Estate, 2012.
3 Gøtzsche PC. Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime: How big pharma has corrupted healthcare. London:Redcliffe, 2013.
4 WMA Declaration of Helsinki 2013; pt. 33.
5 Epstein M. Legal and institutional fictions in medical ethics: a common, and yet largely overlooked, phenomenon. J Med Ethics 2007;33(6):362-364.
http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g22/rr/680463

BioEdge: Evidence-based medicine comes under attack

BioEdge: Evidence-based medicine comes under attack: "evidence-based medicine has its critics, as a bilious outbreak of comment and letters in the BMJ demonstrated recently. Early last month a Glasgow GP, Des Spence, said that the system of EBM had been corrupted. “If we don’t tackle the flaws of EBM there will be a disaster, but I fear it will take a disaster before anyone will listen,” he wrote.

How could anyone fault the notion of treatment based on scientifically validated evidence? No one. But the critics of EBM argue heatedly that the standards for the evidence are often low and tainted by commercial or personal interests."



http://www.bioedge.org/index.php/bioethics/bioethics_article/10841

Health experts with pharma links more likely to talk up risk

"A number of scientists on the World Health Organization’s (WHO) flu advisory committee, which monitors pandemics and provides guidance for governments, for example, have disclosed links with the pharmaceutical industry.
But given that the media can influence demand for pharmaceutical products and perceptions of risk, we set out to examine whether health experts commentating on swine flu more generally were also more likely to have links to drug companies.
Analysing UK newspaper coverage of the swine flu pandemic between April and July 2009 – the period in which the UK government was taking decisions on how best to respond to the emerging pandemic, including providing the public with vaccine and antiviral drugs – we looked for how often scientists were quoted in articles on the pandemic from a wide range of publications.
We then looked at these comments in more detail to see if scientists made an assessment of the risk to the public from swine flu, and if so, we compared these against assessments made by official agencies such as the Department of Health."
"We found that half of the health experts that commentated on the use of antiviral drugs or vaccine had competing interests. And scientists promoting the use of antiviral drugs were eight times more likely to have a competing interest than those that didn’t comment on their use. We also found that health experts with competing interests were six times more likely than those without to predict a higher risk to the public compared to official assessments."
https://theconversation.com/health-experts-with-pharma-links-more-likely-to-talk-up-risk-20108

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: are we helping or harming?


BMJ 2013; 347 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6172 (Published 5 November 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f6172
http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f6172

Making all clinical data public is vital for better medical care

Making all clinical data public is vital for better medical care: "An article published in the journal of the British Medical Association, BMJ, earlier this week illustrates a devastating problem with the “evidence base” in the academic medical literature.

A large proportion of drug trials, particularly those sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, never get published, skewing our picture of drugs' effectiveness and safety."

'via Blog this'

Any sensible person or scientist knows that the drug laws are not based on the science of drugs

David Nutt: 'I was sacked, I was angry, I was right': "Any sensible person or scientist knows that the drug laws are not based on the science of drugs. And it’s a collusion among scientists, politicians, and to some extent the public, to ignore that. It is anti-establishment, but also not, in that it’s such an obvious thing. It’s like the emperor’s new clothes – someone needed to speak up."

'via Blog this'

Medical Students Examine Unconscious Patients Without Consent | Fox News

Medical Students Examine Unconscious Patients Without Consent | Fox News: "Australian and UK medical students carried out intrusive procedures on unconscious and anesthetized patients without first gaining consent, news.com.au reported Friday.

The unauthorized examinations included genital, rectal and breast exams, according to Australian women's magazine Madison, and raised serious questions about the ethics of future doctors.

The research, to be published in international medical journal Medical Education, describes -- among others -- a student with "no qualms" about performing an anal examination on a female patient because she did not think the woman's consent was relevant.

Another case is of a man who was subjected to rectal examinations from a "queue" of medical students after he was anesthetized for surgery.

The author of the study, Professor Charlotte Rees, voiced concerns about senior medical staff ordering students to perform unauthorized procedures, leaving the students torn between the strong ethics of consent in society and the weak ethics of some medical staff."

'via Blog this'

Epidemiology of medical error | BMJ

Epidemiology of medical error | BMJ: "The Harvard and Australian studies into medical error remain the only studies that provide population level data on the rates of injuries to patients in hospitals and they identified a substantial amount of medical error

In the United States medical error results in 44 000–98 000 unnecessary deaths each year and 1 000 000 excess injuries"

http://www.bmj.com/content/320/7237/774

Pharma giant fined billions for fraud


GLOBAL healthcare giant Johnson & Johnson will pay more than $2.3 billion to settle allegations that it fraudulently promoted drugs and used kickbacks to promote sales.
In one of the largest healthcare fraud settlements in US history, J&J's criminal and civil fine covers allegations the company marketed risperidone (Risperdal) and other prescription drugs for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The settlement further covers kickbacks J&J allegedly paid to physicians and pharmacies for prescribing and promoting those drugs, the US Justice Department said yesterday. 
Medical Observer
5tov 2013

MORE than 25% of large randomised clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov have not published

MORE than 25% of large randomised clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov have not published any results in medical literature or in the registry database, according to research published in the BMJ. The researchers examined 585 registered trials with at least 500 participants and which had been completed by 2009. They found 171 trials with a total of almost 300 000 participants had not been published. Industry-sponsored trials were the most likely to remain unpublished. Of unpublished trials, 78% had no results available in ClinicalTrials.gov. For trials where the recruitment status was listed as “completed”, 26% (132/513) remained unpublished, and 29 trials were described as “active, not recruiting”; with 10 of these unpublished. The BMJ authors said trial investigators and sponsors had an ethical obligation to study participants to publish trial results. “The lack of availability of results from these trials contributes to publication bias and also constitutes a failure to honor the ethical contract that is the basis for exposing study participants to the risks inherent in trial participation”, they wrote. “Additional safeguards are needed to ensure timely public dissemination of trial data.”
http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f6104

Scientists voice fears over ethics of drug trials remaining unpublished

Almost a third of large clinical trials in the US still not published five years after being finished, scientists write in BMJ

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/29/scientists-fears-over-unpublished-drug-trials

there are three main conditions which could impair the autonomy of a patient's medical decision: insufficient information, irrational beliefs/desires, and influence of different framing effects

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01973.x/abstract

List of predatory publishers - 2013

http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/12/06/bealls-list-of-predatory-publishers-2013/

corruption is the greatest moral challenge facing medicine today


Bioethical debate tends to focus on controversial medical procedures, such as genetic modification, IVF, euthanasia and abortion. The latest issue of the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics questions this, arguing that corruption is the greatest moral challenge facing medicine today.
In the lead article, Dr Subrata Chattopadhyay asserts that, "undermining the moral vision -- and nobility -- of the art of healing, corruption is arguably the most serious ethical crisis in medicine today". Chattopadhyay says that corruption in medicine is common everywhere, though he focuses his home country of India.The corruption of disgraced former WMA president Ketan Desai is, it seems, indicative of endemic misconduct.
Other articles in the issue include a summary of corruption cases in several of the major pharmaceutical companies of Europe and the US and the declining ethical standards of the Indian Medical Council.