7th International Symposium on Sympathetic Surgery 20th-22nd March 2007 Muro Alto (PE), Brazil
Clinical Autonomic Research. New York:Apr 2007. Vol. 17, Iss. 2, p. 126-44 (19 pp.)
Pity colleagues, pity for these poor patients!
Gross Michel* Institution: Private Cabinet*; Grone - Switzerland
A desperate 22-year-old man comes to consult and tells me about his idea of committing suicide. Since the age of 9, he suffers from a severe cephalic ephidrosis, with blushing face, intensifying with years, to such an extent that it became unbearable over the last year:
''It is a real Calvary''. His family GP assures him that his troubles are going to disappear as he will get older and ''ut aliquid fieri'' he prescribes sage drops and anxiolytic. As these prescriptions do not improve his situation, his GP sends him to an endocrinologist who performs many exams to exclude an hyperthyreosis, a carcinoıd tumor or a pheochromocytoma. Among the considerable number of blood exams, one appears to be out of normal ranges. The patient goes therefore to an haematologist, who does not find anything
abnormal. A neurologist, then consulted, does not suspect anything in particular, but asks however for some radiology exams, including a brain MRI, as well as a Pet-scan, to exclude an adrenal gland tumor. All these exams being normal, the patient is sent to a behaviour therapist to begin a psychotherapy. Exhausted by the
weight of these useless consultations here and there, our young patient, always seeking for the solution to his problems, decides to turn to an acupuncturist, an osteopath, a healer and a radiesthesist, in vain. He then decides to consult a dermatologist and shares with him a summary of information gathered on Internet, including information from my site. Finally, the patient was referred to me.
Aware of that, the GP warns his colleagues by sending a letter indicating that any therapeutic measure other than psychotherapy is not recommended, considering the surgical alternative as irresponsible. I did by the way, not get any call from any of my colleagues. The patient had successful surgery 2 weeks later
(sympathicotomy T2-3-4-5) This recent history redraws, once again, iatrogenic caricatural wandering to which our patients are too often subjected. It has to push us to publish our works, to inform the medical corps, relentlessly and without restraint. The information could also, throughout the public, reach our colleagues. It is at the end an interesting paradox to note that physicians, whose primary role is to relieve patients, are also the primary actors of a film where patients are maintained in a ''medical jail''.
