Exclusions:
Patients with permanent pacemaker, non-sinus cardiac arrhythmias, peripheral vasculopathy or neuropathy, severe lung disease, status postbilateral cervical or thoracic sympathectomy, finger deformity that precludes adequate sensor application, using a-adrenergic receptor blockers, or alcohol or drug abuse during the last 3 years.
The clinic sleep laboratory of the Technion Sleep Medicine Centre, Israel
http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/content/123/3/695.long
CHEST March 2003 vol. 123 no. 3 695-703
MSAC Application no 1130, Assessment Report
The amount of compensatory sweating depends the amount of cell body reorganization in the spinal cord after surgery
The amount of compensatory sweating depends on the patient, the damage that the white rami communicans incurs, and the amount of cell body reorganization in the spinal cord after surgery.
Other potential complications include inadequate resection of the ganglia, gustatory sweating, pneumothorax, cardiac dysfunction, post-operative pain, and finally Horner’s syndrome secondary to resection of the stellate ganglion.
www.ubcmj.com/pdf/ubcmj_2_1_2010_24-29.pdf
Other potential complications include inadequate resection of the ganglia, gustatory sweating, pneumothorax, cardiac dysfunction, post-operative pain, and finally Horner’s syndrome secondary to resection of the stellate ganglion.
www.ubcmj.com/pdf/ubcmj_2_1_2010_24-29.pdf
ETS considered psychiatric surgery - says Dr Nagy
"ETS can alter many bodily functions, including sweating , heart rate , heart stroke volume , blood pressure , thyroid , baroreflex , lung volume , pupil dilation, skin temperature, goose bumps and other aspects of the autonomic nervous system . It can diminish the body's physical reaction to exercise and/or strong emotion, and thus is considered psychiatric surgery. In rare cases sexual function or digestion may be modified as well. "
http://www.lvhyperhidrosis.com/treatment.html
http://www.lvhyperhidrosis.com/treatment.html
MD admits stellate ganglion block impacts on the insular cortex of the brain and alters emotions
Dr. Lipov says, "What really intrigued me about Dr, DeWall's study was he showed Tylenol exerted this emotional effect by acting on the insular cortex of the brain. That's exactly the same area that's affected by a Stellate Ganglion Block.[4]" The specialist is also Director of Chronic Pain Research at Northwest Community Hospital in Arlington Heights.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/227298.php
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/227298.php
if more than one child in 1000 has a febrile seizure, the vaccine is doing more harm than good
PUBLISHED research linking CSL’s influenza vaccine to high rates of fever in children was omitted from the product information for its 2010 Fluvax product, which caused serious adverse reactions in children.
The product information (PI) included data from the 2005 flu season showing that after receiving Fluvax, fever was experienced by 22.5% of children aged from 6 months to less than 3 years and 15.6% of children aged from 3 years to less than 9 years.
However, the PI omitted data from the 2006 season which showed that the rate of fever had increased considerably — to 39.5% in the younger age group and 27% in the older group. Of the 272 children who received the 2006 vaccine, one child in the older group experienced a febrile convulsion.
However, Professor Collignon said it was important to weigh the risks of the vaccine with the risks of influenza itself.
“By my calculations, if more than one child in 1000 has a febrile seizure, the vaccine is doing more harm than good”.
In 2010, Fluvax was found to be causally linked to a significantly increased rate of fevers and febrile convulsions among Australian children. One published estimate put the rate of paediatric febrile convulsions at 3.3 per 1000 doses, or more than 200 times the rate in the only other published population-based estimate. (3)
MJA InSight, 17 October 2011
The product information (PI) included data from the 2005 flu season showing that after receiving Fluvax, fever was experienced by 22.5% of children aged from 6 months to less than 3 years and 15.6% of children aged from 3 years to less than 9 years.
However, the PI omitted data from the 2006 season which showed that the rate of fever had increased considerably — to 39.5% in the younger age group and 27% in the older group. Of the 272 children who received the 2006 vaccine, one child in the older group experienced a febrile convulsion.
However, Professor Collignon said it was important to weigh the risks of the vaccine with the risks of influenza itself.
“By my calculations, if more than one child in 1000 has a febrile seizure, the vaccine is doing more harm than good”.
In 2010, Fluvax was found to be causally linked to a significantly increased rate of fevers and febrile convulsions among Australian children. One published estimate put the rate of paediatric febrile convulsions at 3.3 per 1000 doses, or more than 200 times the rate in the only other published population-based estimate. (3)
MJA InSight, 17 October 2011
CLINICAL practice guidelines are vulnerable to bias
CLINICAL practice guidelines are vulnerable to bias, with only 15% of NHMRC guidelines from Australia’s most prolific guideline developers including a declaration of conflicts of interest, new research has found.
Although a conflict of interest (COI) statement has long been required from authors of research papers, it is often lacking for developers of clinical practice guidelines, despite the influence of guidelines on clinical care.
The research, in the latest issue of the MJA, looked at more than 200 clinical guidelines that were listed on the NHMRC website. Its authors concluded that the NHMRC needed to “urgently promote a more ethically sound development process for guidelines”.
“Our review of the country’s most prolific guideline developers shows that only 15% of guidelines have COI statements”, they said.
“This raises questions about whether medical bodies are affected by unrecognised, and thus unaddressed, extraneous interests, and may erode the trust the community has in the profession to speak authoritatively about health problems.”
MJA InSight, 17 October 2011
Although a conflict of interest (COI) statement has long been required from authors of research papers, it is often lacking for developers of clinical practice guidelines, despite the influence of guidelines on clinical care.
The research, in the latest issue of the MJA, looked at more than 200 clinical guidelines that were listed on the NHMRC website. Its authors concluded that the NHMRC needed to “urgently promote a more ethically sound development process for guidelines”.
“Our review of the country’s most prolific guideline developers shows that only 15% of guidelines have COI statements”, they said.
“This raises questions about whether medical bodies are affected by unrecognised, and thus unaddressed, extraneous interests, and may erode the trust the community has in the profession to speak authoritatively about health problems.”
MJA InSight, 17 October 2011
Deceit and fraud in medical research
Deceit and fraud in medical research is a serious problem for the credibility of published literature. Although estimating its prevalence is difficult, reported incidences are alarming. The spectrum of the problem ranges from what may seem as rather innocuous gift authorship to wholesale fabrication of data. Potential factors which may have promoted fraud and deceit include financial gain, personal fame, the competitive scientific environment and scientific hubris. Fraud and deceit are difficult to detect and are generally brought to the fore by whistleblowers.
International Journal of Surgery
Volume 4, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 122-126
Usman Jaffer, and Alan E.P. Cameron
International Journal of Surgery
Volume 4, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 122-126
Usman Jaffer, and Alan E.P. Cameron
ETS story
Physicians are required to gain informed consent prior to administering a treatment. Informed consent is gained by providing patients with a full accounting of the risks of the treatment as documented in peer-reviewed, published medical/scientific literature.
Your scenario of surgeons being flummoxed by unhappy patients complaining after surgery doesn't hold water. The rules of professional medical ethics require that the treating physician be well versed in the published literature on the treatments he delivers.
There is a mountain of published research (spanning nearly a century) documenting the adverse effects of sympathectomy. There are numerous studies, for example, showing very high rates of severe side effects and studies showing that satisfaction diminishes substantially over the long term.
It is a doctors job to know this stuff and it is their ethical duty to disclose that information to patients.
So, I see the blame thing as pretty cut and dry. Surgeons perfoming sympathectomies routinely withhold information vital to informed consent. Anyone who does objective comparison between what is documented in medical/scientific literature and what is typically disclosed to prospective ETS patients has no choice but reach this conclusion.
And, to make matters worse, many surgeons use testimonials from a hand-selected group of their happiest patients to advocate the surgery. That practice is considered unethical by all medical professional organizations.
http://etsandreversals.yuku.com/reply/22927/Would-you-do-it-again#reply-22927
The functional name for the this surgery is "sympathetic denervation". It's not some super-advanced, modern cure based on recent discoveries in neurophysiology. It's a primitive, destructive procedure. It's a method used on animals for research. It's brute force method...destroy the pathways to the sweat glands over a large region. Unfortunately, it destroys pathways to and from many other organs including the heart and lungs and causes a large number of neuropathological dysfunction. That hasn't changed in the last ten years. It will not and cannot change in the next 1000 years because it will still be a nerve injury 1000 years from now. I'm not making this up. It's a simple fact. Don't let some doctor take advantage of your ignorance
http://etsandreversals.yuku.com/topic/4919/Should-i-have-ETS-surgery#.Tok-TE8YAyk
Your scenario of surgeons being flummoxed by unhappy patients complaining after surgery doesn't hold water. The rules of professional medical ethics require that the treating physician be well versed in the published literature on the treatments he delivers.
There is a mountain of published research (spanning nearly a century) documenting the adverse effects of sympathectomy. There are numerous studies, for example, showing very high rates of severe side effects and studies showing that satisfaction diminishes substantially over the long term.
It is a doctors job to know this stuff and it is their ethical duty to disclose that information to patients.
So, I see the blame thing as pretty cut and dry. Surgeons perfoming sympathectomies routinely withhold information vital to informed consent. Anyone who does objective comparison between what is documented in medical/scientific literature and what is typically disclosed to prospective ETS patients has no choice but reach this conclusion.
And, to make matters worse, many surgeons use testimonials from a hand-selected group of their happiest patients to advocate the surgery. That practice is considered unethical by all medical professional organizations.
http://etsandreversals.yuku.com/reply/22927/Would-you-do-it-again#reply-22927
'Improved sympathectomy' - is it an oxymoron?
"also it seems like the more bad and negative affects were from 10 to 12 years ago when they had just started performing the surgery.. they must have improved it a lot by now.?"This procedure has been performed since the 1920's. Yes, the 1920's. In the 1980's they started to do it using "keyhole" surgery which means they don't have to make a big incision. But, the surgery is no different than what they've been doing for the last 70+ years. It's a nerve injury. You can't "improve" they way you inflict a nerve injury. You can't injure the nerve in some "special" way such that the injury suddenly has a different effect on the body.
The functional name for the this surgery is "sympathetic denervation". It's not some super-advanced, modern cure based on recent discoveries in neurophysiology. It's a primitive, destructive procedure. It's a method used on animals for research. It's brute force method...destroy the pathways to the sweat glands over a large region. Unfortunately, it destroys pathways to and from many other organs including the heart and lungs and causes a large number of neuropathological dysfunction. That hasn't changed in the last ten years. It will not and cannot change in the next 1000 years because it will still be a nerve injury 1000 years from now. I'm not making this up. It's a simple fact. Don't let some doctor take advantage of your ignorance
http://etsandreversals.yuku.com/topic/4919/Should-i-have-ETS-surgery#.Tok-TE8YAyk
sympathectomy will block the chronotropic response
Around 50% of patients have bradycardia in the following minutes of a bilateral surgery with mean and diastolic blood pressure significant reduction. Since the sympathectomy will block the chronotropic response, a significant increase of the ejection volume is observed when the patient moves in the erect position from dorsal decubitus [6]. Two cardiovascular complications were reported in the literature. First, an asystolic cardiac arrest in an 18-year-old woman during the second side (left) of bilateral sympathectomy for severe hyperhidrosis, requiring resuscitation maneuvers, with no chronic sequelae [7]. The second case was reported in a 23-year-old woman in whom a bilateral T2 sympathectomy was performed for facial hyperhidrosis. Two years later, following electrophysiologic studies confirming unopposed vagotonic stimulation, she underwent permanent pacemaker insertion for symptomatic bradycardia [8].
http://icvts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/8/2/238
http://icvts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/8/2/238
many claims in Australia do not result in payments to plaintiffs
However, as with the US research, many claims in Australia do not result in payments to plaintiffs. This fact often comes as a surprise to medical practitioners as it is not well publicised.
It is not a simple matter for a plaintiff to succeed in a claim for compensation based in medical negligence. And it certainly is an expensive exercise especially when there can be no guarantee of success.
For doctors involved in a claim that is successfully defended there is usually no direct financial cost.
Ms Cheryl McDonald is claims department manager with MIGA (Medical Insurance Group Australia).
It is not a simple matter for a plaintiff to succeed in a claim for compensation based in medical negligence. And it certainly is an expensive exercise especially when there can be no guarantee of success.
For doctors involved in a claim that is successfully defended there is usually no direct financial cost.
Ms Cheryl McDonald is claims department manager with MIGA (Medical Insurance Group Australia).
MJA InSight, Issue 38 - 10 Oct, 2011
HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH CERVICO-THORACIC SYMPATHECTOMY
The need for a realistic appraisal of the potentialities for harm in Cervico-Thoracic sympathectomy is apparent on anatomic grounds alone (Orkin et al. ] 950). Fatalities occur from time to time, but only a few reports of such fatalities find their way into the literature (Adriani et al. 1952). Reported complications associated with Ccrvico-Thoracic sympathectomy, which is, in effect a permanent Stellate
Ganglion block (Moore 1954), include pneumothorax, Horner's syndrome, phrenic and recurrent laryngeal nerve damage, infection from oesophageal puncture, cardiac arrhythmias (Tochinai 1974), and very infrequently cardiac arrest (Moore 1954).
The following is a case report of a healthy 18-year-old woman who had bilateral Cervico-Thoracic sympathectomy done in two stages for severe hyperhidrosis in the palms of her hands.
Two episodes of asystolic arrest occurred during the 2nd stage left Cervico-Thoracic sympathectomy.
The
cause of hyperhidrosis apparently originates
from some poorly understood stimulation of the
sympathetic nervous system (Cloward 1969),
and in sensitive patients this may possibly lead
to excessive vagal stimulation to counteract it,
as illustrated by the bradycardia and asystolic
reaction to the sudden removal of the
sympathetic control, and by the high doses of
sympathomimetic drugs necessary to
recommence cardiac activity. Anatomically the
heart is innervated by the cardiac plexus which
consists of the cardiac nerves derived from the
cervical and upper thoracic ganglia of the
sympathetic trunk and branches of the vagus.
The pacemaker of the heart, the sino-atrial
node, is innervated by both the parasympathetic
and sympathetic nerves (King and Coakley
1958). The ventricular muscle of the heart is
supplied solely by the sympathetic nerves, and
the larger branches of the coronary arteries are
also predominantly innervated by sympathetics
(Woollard 1926). These factors may also have a
bearing on the hazard of a bilateral cervico-
thoracic sympathectomy, which leaves the heart
solely under vagal control. Usually, following
denervation, the heart will initiate its own
impulse, without recourse to external agencies,
but there may be a place for transvenous
electrode cardiac pacing, if spontaneous initiation
of impulse is delayed, or bradycardia is severe.
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Vol. V, No. 1, February, 1977
R. F. Y. ZEE
Royal Perth Hospital, Perth
Ganglion block (Moore 1954), include pneumothorax, Horner's syndrome, phrenic and recurrent laryngeal nerve damage, infection from oesophageal puncture, cardiac arrhythmias (Tochinai 1974), and very infrequently cardiac arrest (Moore 1954).
The following is a case report of a healthy 18-year-old woman who had bilateral Cervico-Thoracic sympathectomy done in two stages for severe hyperhidrosis in the palms of her hands.
Two episodes of asystolic arrest occurred during the 2nd stage left Cervico-Thoracic sympathectomy.
The
cause of hyperhidrosis apparently originates
from some poorly understood stimulation of the
sympathetic nervous system (Cloward 1969),
and in sensitive patients this may possibly lead
to excessive vagal stimulation to counteract it,
as illustrated by the bradycardia and asystolic
reaction to the sudden removal of the
sympathetic control, and by the high doses of
sympathomimetic drugs necessary to
recommence cardiac activity. Anatomically the
heart is innervated by the cardiac plexus which
consists of the cardiac nerves derived from the
cervical and upper thoracic ganglia of the
sympathetic trunk and branches of the vagus.
The pacemaker of the heart, the sino-atrial
node, is innervated by both the parasympathetic
and sympathetic nerves (King and Coakley
1958). The ventricular muscle of the heart is
supplied solely by the sympathetic nerves, and
the larger branches of the coronary arteries are
also predominantly innervated by sympathetics
(Woollard 1926). These factors may also have a
bearing on the hazard of a bilateral cervico-
thoracic sympathectomy, which leaves the heart
solely under vagal control. Usually, following
denervation, the heart will initiate its own
impulse, without recourse to external agencies,
but there may be a place for transvenous
electrode cardiac pacing, if spontaneous initiation
of impulse is delayed, or bradycardia is severe.
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Vol. V, No. 1, February, 1977
R. F. Y. ZEE
Royal Perth Hospital, Perth
'Improved sympathectomy' - is it an oxymoron?
"also it seems like the more bad and negative affects were from 10 to 12 years ago when they had just started performing the surgery.. they must have inproved it alot by now.?"I'd like to echo what some others have said just so you are completely clear on this issue. This procedure has been performed since the 1920's. Yes, the 1920's. In the 1980's they started to do it using "keyhole" surgery which means they don't have to make a big incision. But, the surgery is no different than what they've been doing for the last 70+ years. It's a nerve injury. You can't "improve" they way you inflict a nerve injury. You can't injure the nerve in some "special" way such that the injury suddenly has a different effect on the body.
The functional name for the this surgery is "sympathetic denervation". It's not some super-advanced, modern cure based on recent discoveries in neurophysiology. It's a primitive, destructive procedure. It's a method used on animals for research. It's brute force method...destroy the pathways to the sweat glands over a large region. Unfortunately, it destroys pathways to and from many other organs including the heart and lungs and causes a large number of neuropathological dysfunction. That hasn't changed in the last ten years. It will not and cannot change in the next 1000 years because it will still be a nerve injury 1000 years from now. I'm not making this up. It's a simple fact. Don't let some doctor take advantage of your ignorance
http://etsandreversals.yuku.com/topic/4919/Should-i-have-ETS-surgery#.Tok-TE8YAyk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)